Posts by MNS1974:
- A beautifully machined roll bar with built in 25mm clamps replaced a carbon fiber tube, but it weighs the same. This roll bar provides a solid support structure for the roll and tilt mechanism, significantly improving rigidity of the overall unit.
- A new camera stage that allows for tool-free fore, aft, side-to-side and height adjustment. This greatly saves time setting up tilt balance and camera placement, as well as retaining the integrity of the camera stage with slick snap lock adjustments.
- New 25mm clamps which save a lot of tuning time, making it significantly easier to adjust with less points of contact and require half the amount of M3 screws.
- Electronics have been refined with tidy cabling and plenty of slack for adjustment.
- Smaller batteries, yielding a greater capacity, lasting a good 3 hours +. Amazing for their size.
This is part 1 of a 2-part post. The second post will be linked with sample videos and frame grabs of 1080-4K samples
What is an anamorphic lens? An anamorphic lens squeezes a widescreen image onto a non-widescreen aspect ratio. Why would you want to do this? It allows you to retain as much resolution as possible to achieve a cinematic widescreen aspect ratio, negating the need to crop the top and bottom of the frame. Basically it squeezes the image (vertically) and in post production or presentation, you de-squeeze (horizontally) to achieve a wider aspect ratio than origination. The traditional anamorphic aspect ratio is 2.40:1 (technically 2.39:1) and used to be achieved by shooting with very expensive anamorphic lenses. This was primarily done in 35mm standard motion picture film (academy). This was before 2 perf 35 stocks/movements were available in cameras.
Back in the day Panavision and other companies made attachments to the front of there lenses that would anamorphasize a spherical lens. This was the most traditional method used and to a degree became the standard method. Other companies down the line got creative (at a high price) and put the anamorphic elements inside the center of the lens and not p front. The point of this was to reduce flare.
Most anamorphic lenses inherently streak light across the horizontal axis due to the barrel shape that the glass has combined with its coating. Anamorphic glass as always had been an expensive proposition in rental and ownership. The costs are prohibitive for most and traditionally anamorphic lenses have been heavy and slow in transmission. Most rental houses do not own anamorphic glass as the costs are approx. 42K – 50K per lens (for Arri Master Anamorphics) and have a very long wait list (6-12 months).With the advent of widescreen digital most filmmakers sort of gave up on shooting anamorphic, as it was not practical or cost effective.
Unless you were a big time filmmaker you probably would never have the opportunity to see an anamorphic lens, never mind using one. However within the past two years things have changed. Filmmakers started to revisit the idea of 2:40:1 as the resolution of cameras increased but number of pixels wasted on the top and bottom of a 16:9 image (to make a 2.40:1 widescreen frame) did not. Everyone was throwing away resolution that could be retained by squeezing the image into the same area.
Companies like Arri decided to make a 4:3 version of the Alexa (M and Studio) which also added an anamorphic De-squeezing finder option. For 16:9 sensors you would use a 1.3X anamorphic lens instead of 2x, which is used on 4:3 sensors. I imagine some cameras will offer a 4:3 windowed mode, which will not help with resolution retention but will allow for a 1 to 1 match with 2x anamorphic glass.
Enter the Letus 35 Anamorphx adapter. Letus saw the trend towards the resurgence of Anamorphic shooting and decided to put out their own adapter that exceeds almost any other converter / adapter I have seen on the market (sub 20K $) Not only that but they also were smart to capitalize on the much sought after flare look that has become popular over the past two years. Mind you they took this to a different level by offering a low, medium and high flare version of the adapter. The price is very reasonable which makes it appealing to anyone who wants to shoot wide without paying crazy prices. You can buy the setup for a base price of $1,695 USD and can built it up with a matte-box, flags, filter tray, lens support and various lens adapters. This kit is clever in that they geared the near / far adjustment with a standard .8 pitch gear built in so you can use a follow focus or lens motor with it. The snap on filter tray option is very cleaver. Instead of trying to figure out a way to rear filter the system they simple put it in front of the lens, which gives you more options and quality control of your image. The filter tray snaps in and out very simply and has a Patent pending design. You can stack two filters if you buy two trays. I highly recommend the lens support and matte-box with tray options.
The Anamorphx works with almost any lens due to the large 138mm clamping back design. You can use 114mm fronts like CP.2s or Canon Cinema primes or keep it really simple and use Canon L Series glass to keep the costs down. There are adapter rings available on their site for all the standard front sizes like 114mm, 110mm, 95mm, 82mm and 77mm. I am sure you can use a step down ring if you need two (except on wide lenses).
I have tried the Anamorphx with the Canon 1Dc in 4K, S35 1080 and Full Frame 1080. All seemed to work fairly well considering this adapter is rated for 2K. In APS-H and APS-C modes the adapter fared well with even the 16-35mm Canon L and I was able to use almost the entire range of the lens (minus a few mm on the 4K APS-H mode of the 1Dc).
Here are some of the features of the Letus Anamorphx
* 1.33x squeeze, which will work with all current crop of 16:9 cameras, bringing it to a standard 2.39:1
* Works with current prime and zoom lenses
* Custom optical components
* High resolution.
* 0.8 mod pitch gear for critical focus
* Option of single coated or multi-coated lens elements depending on level of lens flare desired. Single coated will produce more flares.
* CNC aluminum housing
* Mounting solution for 114mm outside diameter lens like Zeiss CP* and adapting ring for smaller lens like 77mm, 82mm, etc.
* 1/4-20 thread hole for lens support
* Made ready with matte box (Optional)
* Patent pending clip on 2-stage filter (Optional)
Front diameter: 138mm – Thickness: 65mm – Weight: 1.5lbs without matte-box & 1.9lbs w/matte-box – Snap-on filter tray: 0.35lbs – Filter size: 4×5.65”
This concludes part 1 of my 2-part post. I will be posting some video clips and tests on part 2.
Michael N Sutton
Its was a great day today. I saw the FedEx truck come to a slow roll in front of my house and I knew something amazing was about to be delivered. It was my new Freefly Cinema MoVi M10! I first laid eyes on the MoVi just before NAB, and I knew right away it was going to be a winner.
Good friend Vicent Laforet did a great job assisting in the Movi’s unveiling, getting everyone to think about what possibilities suddenly lay ahead. His 2nd video filmed using the MoVi had everyone asking, “How they hell did they do that?!” We soon find out it wass filmed by guiding the MoVi down the edge of a building with rope. (holy s that was a great shot!) At Philip Bloom’s NAB party Tabb from Freefly had everyone gathered around the MoVi, as if it were a hot girl in a bikini. (Myself included!) Guys like Rodney Charters, Alex Buono, Philip Bloom, Dan Chung, etc were drooling over the system and understandably so. They saw what I saw. An amazing unconventional tool with a huge amount of practicality that would broaden the way we think about filmmaking.
I know there are competitors out there, but this article will focus specifically on the MoVi M10. Freefly may not have been the first to come up with the idea, but they did give us the best brushless gimbal on the market and delivered exactly what they said they would. (Which is rare in this industry.) They did it better and they did it right. Enough about that, back to my post.
Since seeing it at NAB Freefly has made several key improvements to the M10 system.
The MoVi is a tool that breaks the bounds of a Steadicam, EZ Rigs, and other handheld devices that allow for camera mobility. The MoVi provides smooth, adjustable stabilization on three axis points via 3 x brushless motors wound by Freefly and an IMU / 6DOF (Inertial Measurement Unit / 6 degrees of freedom) sensor to counter camera movement. Unlike the three axis gimbals of the past the MoVi does not use servos with pulleys and belts. Another innovation? Instead of off the shelf technology, Freefly has built their own brushless motor controller with ARM Processors allowing them to use custom algorithms to drive the motors at a stronger rate than existing systems. This keeps the motors and the electronics housing small and Freefly has done an excellent job interfacing all points of connection, including a GPS module.
I have found one of the most impressive parts of the MoVi to be the software, and how it adjusts your interaction with the rig. It’s extremely well designed and thought out. With some RC knowledge and an understanding of the center of gravity (CG), it is fairly easy to figure out the various control settings and how to tune and balance the gimbal. (Mind you I have been tuning gimbals and working with PID values for a little over 8 months now, and have been a Steadicam operator for over 15 years).
It is important to understand the basic physics of camera balance before using the MoVi. The M10 comes with a great docking / balancing stand that will allow you to key in balance on all your pivot points. If you do not have a experience in how to counter act an unbalanced camera, this process can take you an hour. Once you know what you are doing you can get the process down in a minute or two. I have seen people spend two hours balancing a rig, simply because they did not understand physics and counter measures. You want your camera to be balanced on all three axis simultaneous as the better the CG, the better the result.
If you are able to balance your camera you are doing several things that aid in getting better results. First, the better the balance, the less power is required for the motors. The less work they do, the longer your batteries last, and the unit operates longer as it runs cooler. Also, less counter action is required which means less stress on all components. So just like a Steadicam, dynamic balance is key. The only difference is that you do not want any drop-time like you do with a Steadicam. You want the tilt, roll and pan to pretty much stay where you put it, which means less work for the motors, controller and ultimately you.
Once you have your camera balanced on all three axis you are then ready to dial in your parameters. Freefly has stepped up to not only provide software for Windows, but also for Mac and Android (I hear iOS devices support is also coming). As I said previously, the software for the system is amazing. Unlike SimpleBGC, Martinez BRUGi, EVVGC etc it is very intuitive and heavily GUI based without unknowns. The MoVi Configurator software is nothing less than astonishing if you have used off the shelf gimbal software. You simply turn on your MoVi, enable Bluetooth to “discoverable” and within a few seconds you are ready to go with the Freefly Configurator. Having it set up on an Android tablet gives you the most flexibility as you can make adjustments on the fly, which is needed for a fast paced set. Unlike anything else the Freefly Configurator shows a live status of:
Software tabs are as follows: Tuning (pan, tilt and roll stiffness settings), Majestic Config (follow mode w/ pan, tilt windows and smoothing), General (application: Handheld or Aerial, roll trim, max and min tilt angles), Remote (pan joystick smoothing, pan joystick exponential, pan joystick window, tilt joystick smoothing), Remote Control Configuration (Radio type: if not stock Spektrum, map remote mode, map remote pan, map remote pan rate, map remote tilt, map remote tilt rate, map remote roll trim) and Expert Mode (for Gyro and output filtering: no need to touch these unless you understand LPF, etc). All of these tabs, in combination with the live status monitoring, are great ways to tune the shot as needed. With dual operator mode you can go from single operator to dual operator, as long as the RC controller is turned on before the MoVi. Switching back and forth between majestic and a second operator makes a great option for complicated shots.
Freefly has done a great job of making the MoVi as user friendly as possible, but like any tool it is best off in the hands of someone who knows how to tune it, operate it and troubleshoot it. Having a MoVi tech on location is highly advisable. If you have never used a rig like this, or do not have understanding of how it works, it could take more than a day to get comfortable with it. Five yourself a few extra days. If renting, ask your rental house if they have a tech on hand who understands the hardware/software and how to aid in shot planning.
There are limitations on what you can do because of the weight. For some reason everyone wants to put the heaviest camera on the rig, not understanding inertial forces and the strain it would put on the body. Although the MoVi can handle a Red Epic and a heavy lens, its best suited for cameras like the Canon 1Dc, or an Epic with a Canon prime. (Or similar weight cameras.) Maxing out the MoVi can be done but its not going to perform the same as it would with a camera that is 2-3 pounds under the maximum. You should also factor in wireless follow focus, and video transmission. The New Hocus Products Axis 1 (not to be confused with the Hocus Focus) is a highly recommended wireless system for the MoVi M10 due to its excellent performance and light weight receiver. For wireless video either the Paralinx or the Teradek Bolt are the go-to in the industry.
Some MoVi tips:
Keep your accessories light, as you will need to mount a motor rod and will probably want to tape a filter to the front of your lens. Keep your cables tidy and out of the way of pivot points on the rig. Slack in your cables for pan, tilt and roll clearance so they do not pull out of what they are attached too. Power your camera and accessories off of a Lipo with 12v regulator to keep the rig as light as possible. Learn the CG of your main cameras you plan to fly with the MoVi. Keep track of your Freefly Configurator settings as they vary for different weights of camera packages and for different shooting styles. Properly charged and balanced batteries are key to optimal operation (buy extras). Note your RC settings and defaults. You can always go back to these as a baseline for tuning which is very important. Get an EZ-Rig. This can greatly add to your operating and amount of up time. It will also save your back and muscles from those long Epic shoots where your arms will feel like rubber afterward. The EZ-Rig will allow you to hand off the rig and vise versa. (This will take some practice to nail.) Think of unconventional ways to put the camera where you could not previously (with a rope, on a Steadicam arm, on a car rig, etc) The MoVi provides hundreds of options that were not possible with this level of stabilization.
So overall the Freefly MoVi M10 offers a lot that other systems cannot provide or do as well. Not only is Freefly Cinema focused on the professional user but they also offer stellar support that is based in the USA. Freefly designed a solid manual and posted some great tutorial videos on their Vimeo channel, which give me an increased level of confidence in the product and its performance. A lot of hard work, dedication and innovation have gone into the Freefly MoVi and you can see it when you pick one up and use it for the first time. Sure there will be competitors, but I think the MoVi brand will be around for a while as they have not made any compromises in quality, build, support and refinement.
The MoVi M10 is priced at $14,995 and comes with the rig, 2 x batteries, a charger, a docking/balance stand, tools, and Spektrum controller. Its little brother the MoVi M5 will be available around end-of-year with a price of $4,995 and comes with the rig, stand, 2 x batteries and a charger. You can pre-order either one or the MoVi MR (for all you RC copter users) at MoViRig . All three are a great investment as they are sure to pay for themselves rather quickly once one demonstrates some of the dynamic shots you can provide to your client / show. Expect to see some MoVi M10 and M5 custom accessories from Sawmill Cinema in the very near future. You can rent the MoVi M10 from Rule Boston Camera by contacting them or myself directly.
Thank you’s to Freefly Cinema, Tabb Firchau, Hugh Bell, Rule Boston Camera, Wide Open Camera, Peter Hoare, Hocus Products, Jared Abrams, Sawmill Cinema, Carson Garner, Philip Bloom and Vincent Laforet.
If you have any questions on the MoVi M10 feel free to email me or hit me up on Twitter or Facebook:
email: mike at mns1974 dot com
One of the hottest things outside of the Freefly MoVi at NAB this year was from a competing multi-rotor company DJI. No it was not a camera stabilizer (although they do make them), but rather their new quad-copter the DJI Phantom. You have all probably seen or know someone who has one as they have blown up in the entry level aerial market. Beyond that the hobby seemed to explode with the release of the Phantom and this was not even much of a topic last year in our business outside of niche experts and specialists. The Phantom looks like a toy but it is in fact an excellent starter to professional GoPro camera ship. A great part of its appeal is its ability to leverage DJI’s Naza technology which for all intensive purposes provides a stable easy to fly aerial platform that does not require a lot of skill to fly. It features a 6 degrees of freedom IMU sensor built into the hardware which communicates shifts in yaw, pitch, roll, acceleration, etc to the quad copters brain telling it to counter those abrupt movements, in-tern providing stabilized flight. They system also features a fail safe in place so that if you break its 2.4Ghz radio contact the Phantom will rise up into the sky come to your launch position and land within a few feet of you (not guaranteed without the GPS upgrade option). Right outside of the box the Phantom for most of us would not cut it for any real quality GoPro work (sounds funny reading that) but with a few modifications and upgrades it can become a very serious tool or at least a gateway to bigger and better copters.
The DJI is a great entry solution that sells for $699. You are going to add probably another $600-1200 in parts, upgrades, etc to sustain it as a hobby or basic aerial platform. Do not think $699 is all you need to get into this. Here are some things you may need or want to get started:
There are several two axis gimbal options for the GoPro that pair well with the Phantom. The first of course is DJI’s own Zenmuse for GoPro Hero 3 which provides rock solid lock on horizon (or any angle you adjust to) without any sacrifices. Vibration, wind, etc are gone as is a good amount of jello that those two things introduce to the GoPro when shooting several hundred feet in the air. Another good gimbal option is the Tarot GoPro gimbal. This is the one I use as it was a fraction of the price and works just as good if not better. You will have to do a few modifications to make this work but nothing more than a few minutes of your time to achieve. Both offer pitch control as long as you have enough channels and a control on your transmitter. There are hundreds of other gimbal options as well that you can pair up with a AlexMos, EvvGc, or Martinez brushless gimbal controller board or of course you can go the servo gimbal route (again if you have the channels available and a way to control pitch)
A great option for the DJI Phantom is going with a better brain. The Naza-M v2 or Wookong auto pilot system expands on what your quadcopter can do in regards to stability and control. The DJI Wookong will allow you to program in waypoints so that you can fly from one GPS co-ordinate to another. Both offer GPS which offers better control for fail safe and coordinates for telemetry downlink. This will give you more data to improve your flying skills as well if you leverage it. If you start to get serious you will want to look into a video downlink with on screen display input so that you can fly via first person view (FPV). Flying this way is more like a video game and for most offers a much better level of flying control. This is a serious consideration for most as once your quad/hexa/octo copter is out of view there is no real way to see where it is heading which can lead to a lost investment. You cannot always bank on failsafe to recover your out of range copter so FPV can ideally be a back up for recovery if you fly out of your field of vision. For FPV you are going to need a video downlink system. Ideally you want a 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz transmitter and receiver with a range of at least 1km. You are looking at a 600 – 2000 transmitter with decent antennas. Test this system out before you fly so you know what channels work at the distance you need. Would suck to have video in the air and to loose it out of your field of view and end up flying blind. You will also need a bright outdoors monitor (these are all SD) and a hoodman to block glare and sun. No point in having a first person view if the sun is blocking out the image. You will need a battery to power the monitor and the receiver as well. On the copter side you will want to have some regulated 12v power for the transmitter. Some ferrite cores will reduce and interference you might get from the rest of the copter components which can cause lines in your video link. On top of this you can add an on screen display (OSD) to overlay flight data like horizon, distance, height, voltage, etc. Its always good to know if that battery is about to die so you can be proactive and fly back in advance of a potential crash.
The Phantom has a few upgrade kits to make things easier for you. One of the easiest and most recommended is the prop guard upgrade. This is great if you plan on flying indoors for example or next to buildings. The stock DJI props are very fragile and have even been known to crack in high wind flying which will cause a crash. Look at getting some carbon fiber or carbon nylon mix props. I advise against using larger props as you will burn out your stock motors and will get some erratic flying action especially in higher winds.
Want to go bigger? I use a DJI F450 quad-copter or F550 Hexa-copter which has more lift, a bigger footprint (which could be a bad thing) and more space to cram in electronics. These are sold as kits, as almost ready to fly and as ready to fly. If you have some basics in RC and electronics I would go with a basic kit (F550) which consists of 6x ESC’s, 6x motors, 6x 8″ props, 6x 10″ props, the body, arms, and power lead. You will need some solder, battery, charger, RC transmitter, RC receiver (get more than 4 channels, ideally 7 or 8), and a flight controller. For flight controllers there are several options. The first is to stick with DJI. The Naza, Naza-M v2 and Wookong are the lower to higher end controllers. These tell the motors what the receiver, GPS, power, etc commands and it in exchange determines orientation, compensations, etc to the motors. There are other third parties as well like APM, Multi Wii, Zero UAV, Arduflyer Rabbit etc. Most of these are open source and personally unless you are someone competent in Arduino programing can be a problem and unpredictable. Some of them have a gui of their own but to each his own. I personally like the DJI software as its straight forward, easy to use and now is available on iphone if you have the BTU Bluetooth module option ($50 for Naza-M v2)
If you are an expert then you do not need to read any of this. If you are looking to start big and go pro take a look at the DJI 800 or the Freefly Cinema Cinestar 8 (my dream copter). These beasts can hold a Red Epic with ease and have significant lifting power and maneuverability. When you get into this range you are looking at a serious investment and pretty much all of these are custom setup’s in regards to down link, radios, gimbal control, etc. Look at spending $7k-20K on a setup like this, not to mention the extra parts, etc you will want to have on hand. Maybe even a second one for when…..not if it crashes. I think big or small we have had at least one. When I was flying my Trex 700 helicopter I knew one day I would either never see it again or it would suffer a catastrophic crash. It crashed hard. I sold my backup and stayed away from the hobby for years. Enter the popularity of quad, hexa and quad copters. They have rejuvenated my interest and with the amazing quality of the GoPro Hero 3 Black when in 2.7K shooting in protune the doors have opened again. I am also noticing a lot of wedding shooters, sports shooters etc now getting into FPV and greatly increasing the production value by offering aerial flyovers, etc. There is nothing like a shot that starts at the ground and goes 400′ into the air or a fly around of your lead actor, etc. You can offer some epic shots that you could never have offered in the past without spending thousands of dollars to hire a specialized team. However there are guidelines and restrictions to flying that most may not know about and the law varies from state to state. Legally you can get into some big trouble if you are shooting commercially without a permit and proper clearance, etc from the FAA. You also have to remember peoples sensitivities about privacy etc are also at an all time high and your Phantom can be viewed as a drone by the guy who does not want his backyard to be filmed. Wherever you fly make sure you know your surroundings as well. Flying around people or in crowds is not a good idea. Leave that to the pros. You can seriously hurt someone even with a Phantom. You can do some serious property damage and get yourself into all kinds of legal issues if you do not plan ahead of time. Keep the communication open if you plan on flying in your neighborhood. Talk to your neighbors before you fly over their pool were someone might be sunbathing nude. Most people will be intrigued with your copter but some might think you are spying on them so do yourself a favor and get a vibe of what is and is not cool before you launch.
Last comment is that you will crash. You should have extra propellers, extra arms, ESC’s, motors, batteries, etc. Do not get into this if you can barely pay for it to have the basics. You will be disappointed if you hit a tree or it decides to take off because someones 2.4Ghz baby monitor has a stronger signal on a close channel. Do not bank on failsafe saving your investment / toy from being lost over the treeline. Be smart and fly safe.
Michael N Sutton
you can find me at Rule Boston Camera
My good friends at Canon USA sent me the Canon 15.5-47mm T/2.8 compact cine zoom and the 14.5-60mm T/2.6 cine zoom lens to test and play with for a few weeks and here are my findings. First off the two have a very similar focal range. Secondly one costs twice as much as the other. One is a lot bigger and heavier as well. So why would anyone want the 14.5-60mm at 9.9lbs vs the 15.5-47mm at 4.8lbs? So why such a big price, weight and size difference? In many ways the compact is superior in that it has EF contacts on the EF version. It has a closer minimum object distance. Its lighter and compact. They both have the same amount of aperture blades. The compact is half the price. The only reason I can come up with is timing. The 14.5-60mm was released earlier with the 30-300mm. The quality of materials is the same, the markings are on both sides of the lens, almost everything about the compact seems superior.
So I shot some tests with the two and could not find anything that stood out as to why one would choose the 14.5-60mm over the 15.5-47mm. That extra 12mm just doesn’t seem to justify the price. Is Canon going to phase out the heavier lens? Not from the responses I have gotten. I was told the 14.5-60mm is a good pairing with the 30-300mm and because the two are similar in weight and size that many professionals on set would prefer it over the compact. Here are some specs of the two lenses.
14.5-60mm on left – 15.5-47mm on right.
CN-E14.5-60mm T2.6 Cinema Zoom specs:
Mount Type: EF (S) or PL
Zoom Ratio: 4.1x
Focal Length Range: 14.5-60mm
Number Of Iris Blades: 11
Maximum Photometric Aperture T Number 1:2.6 at 14.5-60mm
MOD From Front of Lens 2′ 4″
Size Length: 5.35 x 6.42 x 12.83 in.
Weight: 9.9 lb.
Front Diameter: Ø136mm
CN-E15.5-47mm T2.8 Compact Cinema Zoom specs:
Mount Type: EF (S) or PL
Zoom Ratio: 3.0x
Focal Length Range: 15.5-47mm
Number Of Iris Blades: 11
Maximum Photometric Aperture T Number: T 2.8 (15.5-47mm)
MOD From Front of Lens: 1’8″
Size Length mm mod: 114 x 125 x 222 mm
Front Diameter : 114mm
No contacts on the 14.5-60mm
I have own a Canon 30-105mm compact cine zoom which is physically the same size as the 15.5-47mm. The two make a perfect pair as far as I am concerned. It makes me wonder if Canon will attempt a compact version of the 30-300mm or if that is even possible at that range. They can do it with their still lens line so its feasible depending on the mechanics.
Canon originally released all their cinema zooms with either a PL or an EF mount. You had to choose between the two and it was not an option to swap them. This obviously hindered sales as clients would want the option for both mounts as companies like Angenieux and Zeiss were offering mount swap kits. After much complaining from rental houses, customers and myself of course, Canon offered a mount swap option where you would send in your lens and canon would do the conversion. Not very practical of course. They since changed that to have qualified rental houses swap their own mounts which was a little better. Matt Duclos of Duclos Lenses one up’d Canon by offering their excellent Multi-Mount system which allows mount swaps from EF, PL, Nikon, etc within seconds. Its a great option and the second I heard about it I sent my lens off to Matt to get the conversion. Canon is slowly starting to get it and I have a feeling that lenses in the future will have a easy mount swap option. I also think / know we will be seeing some new Canon lenses at NAB next year. They will be leaked a little before of course.
I get a lot of people asking if the Canon Cinema Primes will ever be offered in PL. The answer I was always told was no. Based on the design and looking at them I cannot see this working without them retrofitting the back of the lens. The 85mm for example would have the element sticking well out the back of the PL which would cause damage. However this does not mean that canon will not offer a new set of primes down the line that are in PL.
Over the year I will be testing and playing with a lot of Canon Cinema glass. What are your thoughts as to why these two zoom lenses (14.5-60mm and 15.5-47mm) are so similar yet so different? Have you had a chance to shoot with either? Post your comments here.
Thank you to Rule Boston Camera and Canon USA.
The other day I got my hands on the yet unreleased Convergent Design Odyssey 7Q RAW recorder / monitor. The prototype was 75% there but this one was specifically set up for getting 2K out of the FS700. The quality of the screen is pretty impressive on the unit at 1280 x 800….Well its actually 1280 x 700 as 100 of the lines are used for menu items. Remember the 7Q is actually a quad monitor which allows four input signals as well as quadrant assignment and switching. The touchscreen on the proto was very responsive and easy to read. A huge step over the Gemini 4:4:4. The 7Q also has 1:1 pixel which is great for checking focus and even works in 4K mode. Tap the screen two times to punch in 1:1 and four times to punch in for 4K. Also featured are full screen, quad screen and overlay waveform (luma, RGB, Parage, Red, Green, Blue, etc. Histogram, False color, Zebras and peaking are all built into the unit as well and both work great with a nice level of adjust ability.
There is a Bluetooth antennae built into the unit which will allow remote control and menu settings on a smartphone. This is a future offering and will not offer a proxy window of what is being recorded. You can also assign the inputs and outputs as four inputs and two outputs or two inputs and four outputs all are bidirectional. There is also HD-SDI to HDMI cross conversion built in. All the inputs are 3G-SDI
The FS700 support option will the be first offering from Convergent with a roll out on options for the device spread out over the year into 2014. I got to see and try 2K 120fps and 240fps out of the FS700 into the 7Q and it worked fine. 4K was not yet available as an option but I am told 4K DPX is coming. The second option will be the Canon C500 which will have uncompressed RAW recording capability as .RMF files spread across two SSD drives. A 4K compressed codec is also in the works but I cannot mention the name of said codec as it has not yet pasted qualifications, etc (and therefore legally they cannot say). Avid DNxHD will be a standard offering with the 7Q and will be an upgrade option for the base model 7.
No more fans required. Entire back is a heat sink.
Some of the big things I noticed are that the SSD offerings have changed. Originally there was going to be a 960GB drive but now it is 256gb and 512gb only. This is due to new drive qualifications and testing of the unit where Convergent had found better drives that use lower power at a higher speed. The new drives no longer have to cache and record later and only take 10 seconds to format. This is a big improvement although I think the bigger capacity was still appealing. High bandwidth formats like Alexa RAW and C500 RAW both require you to have two drives mounted. Both formats require Clip Merger software to mux the files into one folder in post as files are spread across two drives for parity and speed. Mind you, Clip Merger is very quick and can process a terabyte of data in under a minute.
Also of note you will no longer need a proprietary transfer station as the new SSD’s are 2.5″ and will work with the Seagate thunderbolt adapter/dock. However the unit will only work with Convergent SSD’s and there will not be any others qualified to work with the Odyssey.
Overall the prototype worked great. The 7Q is planned for release sometime around the first week of September with option upgrades and option rentals to follow. If you are looking for a high quality monitor and are also in the market for a recorder the 7Q is a great option. The base model however will only allow for DNxHD and does not have the same amount of inputs etc as the 7Q so think about future needs vs the now.
Compact but feature rich.
You can follow me on twitter at @MNS1974