<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I, EDITOR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/mns-1974/i-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/cameras/i-editor/</link>
	<description>Motion &#38; Stills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 02:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl Gregory</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/cameras/i-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darryl Gregory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopencamera.com/?p=3374#comment-703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am really trying not to say...&quot;I told you so&quot;
But I have no choice, Adobe is on point with the latest DSLR codecs
and the Red Color Science from the MX sensor,
If there is a time to jump ship it is now, I&#039;m editing a full feature in Pp cs5.5
and loving it.

I will not return to FCP unless they listen to the professional customer base that
has made FCP what it is, and what it should be in the future.



.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really trying not to say&#8230;&#8221;I told you so&#8221;<br />
But I have no choice, Adobe is on point with the latest DSLR codecs<br />
and the Red Color Science from the MX sensor,<br />
If there is a time to jump ship it is now, I&#8217;m editing a full feature in Pp cs5.5<br />
and loving it.</p>
<p>I will not return to FCP unless they listen to the professional customer base that<br />
has made FCP what it is, and what it should be in the future.</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kalan</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/cameras/i-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Kalan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopencamera.com/?p=3374#comment-700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m still pissed that when I upgraded to an Intel iMac, (Which I needed to run Hasselblad Phocus software) I could no longer run Photoshop CS2 and FCP4.5 which I have lots of $$$ invested in!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still pissed that when I upgraded to an Intel iMac, (Which I needed to run Hasselblad Phocus software) I could no longer run Photoshop CS2 and FCP4.5 which I have lots of $$$ invested in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaj Kjellesvig</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/cameras/i-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaj Kjellesvig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopencamera.com/?p=3374#comment-699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very well put good sir. I agree with your rationale. I however I am getting it as a gift so I&#039;m going to start learning it now in case it picks up in the future. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well put good sir. I agree with your rationale. I however I am getting it as a gift so I&#8217;m going to start learning it now in case it picks up in the future. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/cameras/i-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopencamera.com/?p=3374#comment-698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great points. You&#039;re thinking logically, and in an ever-changing creative business, that&#039;s a smart way to go about making a living. Keep your eyes open to what&#039;s available and make thoroughly thought decisions. Don&#039;t just pull the trigger on something and immediately blame the company for the product&#039;s short-comings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points. You&#8217;re thinking logically, and in an ever-changing creative business, that&#8217;s a smart way to go about making a living. Keep your eyes open to what&#8217;s available and make thoroughly thought decisions. Don&#8217;t just pull the trigger on something and immediately blame the company for the product&#8217;s short-comings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Drake</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/cameras/i-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Drake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopencamera.com/?p=3374#comment-694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejnl</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/cameras/i-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ejnl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopencamera.com/?p=3374#comment-692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Skid!
Thanks for your post, I&#039;m really identified with your opinions about craft and experience of filmmakers. It is a spoken truth, that the DSLR technology changed a lot, now even a family home video could look from stills as a low budget rommance. But in first few seconds you could recognise that there&#039;s no film language used and it&#039;s just a series of boring shots accompanied by &quot;emotional&quot; music. It&#039;s about a year ago I&#039;ve seen a short film by a videographer who specializes on wedding videos and looked epic. BUT It  was just another wedding video no matter how beatiful every frame was. But to my point - most of your latest articles were telling the same thing mentioned above. Why don&#039;t just get back to normal writing man, instead of pointing out the well known fact that there are amateur filmmakers and pros?:) I&#039;m a real fan of your blog. Cheers, Martin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Skid!<br />
Thanks for your post, I&#8217;m really identified with your opinions about craft and experience of filmmakers. It is a spoken truth, that the DSLR technology changed a lot, now even a family home video could look from stills as a low budget rommance. But in first few seconds you could recognise that there&#8217;s no film language used and it&#8217;s just a series of boring shots accompanied by &#8220;emotional&#8221; music. It&#8217;s about a year ago I&#8217;ve seen a short film by a videographer who specializes on wedding videos and looked epic. BUT It  was just another wedding video no matter how beatiful every frame was. But to my point &#8211; most of your latest articles were telling the same thing mentioned above. Why don&#8217;t just get back to normal writing man, instead of pointing out the well known fact that there are amateur filmmakers and pros?:) I&#8217;m a real fan of your blog. Cheers, Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
