JACK OF ALL TRADES, MASTER OF NONE, MOST, ALL?

Cameras

Convergence. It’s given us the iPhone, it’s given us hybrid cars, it’s given us video DSLRs. It’s also given rise to a technocracy in which those with the big armoury of technical skills thrive, and the specialists struggle. Photographers become filmmakers, necessarily become editors, etc. etc. In performing arts they talk about the double threat, the triple threat, the (whisper it) quadruple threat. Justin Timberlake is a quadruple threat: he sings, he dances, he acts and he’s funny. Holy crap.

In production it’s perfectly normal to be asked to take on multiple roles these days. People cost money, diversify your skill set, save the production money, take home more yourself. I remember when I started my career, we shot on DV with our trusty PD150 and we had FCP1 for company on our Blue Dalmatian iMac. We could direct, we could shoot, we could edit, we could knock up graphics in Photoshop and that was pretty much it. Grading was a dark art, After Effects witchcraft. Then came FCP2 and a three way color wheel. And suddenly it all started to make sense. Those idiotic filters I kept applying to stuff to make it look better could now be reduced to one single, powerful color tool that could create a look. Suddenly I was a colorist as well.

It snowballed. Back then DVD authoring was a service you could charge a lot of money for. We purchased DVD Studio Pro which was just a horrible piece of software, but we could offer authoring and make a bit more money. So I became a DVD author. As a result of this we became experts in encoding to MPEG2 and by extension encoding in general. Suddenly we were offering bespoke encoding services. It was at this time that I bit the bullet, bought a book and taught myself After Effects over the course of about a month. It’s one of the smartest things I’ve ever done. Now, I was a motion graphics artist.

One of our clients needed a voiceover doing for their production one day. It was a instructional sports DVD. They asked for VO samples and just for a laugh I recorded one myself and sent it over. They picked me. I DJ’ed on local radio for a while and read the evening news daily for over a year so it’s not so surprising. Now I was a voiceover artist.

When I was younger I was a pretty handy musician. I played the violin and the piano to Grade 8 standard and I sang for a small ensemble that toured around the world. A friend of mine is a film composer and began asking me to sing on film soundtracks. A couple of months ago I sang on the Johnny English Reborn score. I’m a professional singer.

Two years ago, almost to the day, I bought a 7D and began blogging about my experiences. Since then I’ve written quite a few articles for magazines and am now paid to produce an editorial lifestyle blog for a luxury brand. Now I am a journalist. I also write scripts but no-one’s paid me to do that yet, so it doesn’t count. I pitched an entire year’s worth of content marketing strategy to the same luxury brand and have now been taken on as a consultant specifically charged with building a consumer audience for the brand. Now I am a marketing consultant.

As you can see, I have many hats. Director, editor, cameraman, producer, colorist, motion graphics artist, encoder, DVD author, VO artist, singer, journalist, marketing consultant. Jack of all trades? It certainly looks that way.

Back in 2001 this was how we had to operate in order to survive. We had to take on multiple responsibilities to provide a package deal to our clients. On their own our skills weren’t really strong enough, but as an end to end service we were attractive. The result of this kind of strategy is a drastically steep learning curve and a radically reduced life expectancy thanks to chronic sleep deprivation.

I just had a peek at my CV from a few years ago. At the top it proudly states all of the above skills. What a turnip. How did I ever think that was actually appealing to people? I’ve now removed all that crap and it simply states ‘Director’. Now that’s just me, but somehow, these days, it’s important to me that I present myself as a specialist. Yes, I can do all those other things, but really, the one that matters, and more importantly, the one that will carry its value the furthest in the face of convergence, decreased barriers to entry and the low cost of tools.

There’s nothing wrong with being a multi-hyphenate but there comes a point where it’s going to be better to let one skill take prominence and keep the others in the background. I always ask people whether they’d be hired purely on the strength of just one of their multiple skillsets; just as a cameraman, editor, graphics artist etc. Of my many hats the directing, after effects, editing, camerawork, journalism and consultancy are the ones that I could expect to be hired to do regardless of my ability to do the others. The rest of them aren’t really strong enough to stand on their own two feet. Still, not too shabby. Not just that but I’ve had a career in extreme sports, music videos, factual entertainment television and of course corporate production. I actually want to do drama and I’m finding all that other work doesn’t count for squat, not the least little bit, when it comes to drama. I’m practically at square one again, having to specialise.

These days it seems everyone is a ‘Director. DP. Editor.’ How many of them would actually be hired just to direct, just to DP, just to edit? I’m not having a go, I just find it a little disingenuous. I can see the specialist becoming more attractive again and, maybe it’s just the stage I’m at in my career, but I’d like to be a bloody good director. And that’s all. Time to rip up the old website and stop being disingenuous. What would you like to be?

Twitter has changed: @aka_skid

Admin
Jared Abrams is a cinematographer based in Hollywood, California. After many years as a professional camera assistant he switched over to still photography. About two years ago a new Canon camera changed the way the world sees both motion and still photography. He just happened to be in the right place at the right time.
  • http://twitter.com/jdwiden Jeremy Widen

    I would love to just have “script supervisor” on my list, but as someone who’s just starting out, I’m finding a lot more work being able to say “camera op/ AC” or “editor” or whatever else I happen to need to be called that day. Do you think it would be advantageous for someone starting out to specialize, or to be a jack-of-all-trades?

  • http://twitter.com/jdwiden Jeremy Widen

    I would love to just have “script supervisor” on my list, but as someone who’s just starting out, I’m finding a lot more work being able to say “camera op/ AC” or “editor” or whatever else I happen to need to be called that day. Do you think it would be advantageous for someone starting out to specialize, or to be a jack-of-all-trades?

  • http://twitter.com/jdwiden Jeremy Widen

    I would love to just have “script supervisor” on my list, but as someone who’s just starting out, I’m finding a lot more work being able to say “camera op/ AC” or “editor” or whatever else I happen to need to be called that day. Do you think it would be advantageous for someone starting out to specialize, or to be a jack-of-all-trades?

  • http://twitter.com/elskidblog El Skid

    Starting out you have to be open to doing a bunch of things. Experience is the most valuable yardstick to measure your progress with. Good or bad, all experiences are important. A little bit of chutzpah when you’re starting out is also a very good thing. I love it when I see DSLR filmmakers telling me they just want to be a DoP. I think it’s so positive and gives them much needed focus. Sometimes all this crap is just marketing, but we’re all playing a value for money game now and additional assets, whether they’re skills or equipment, can often sweeten the deal. Never easy.

  • http://nofilmschool.com Koo

    First of all: I would totally hire you as a voiceover guy. I’m off to buy some Nivea for Men right now because there’s a swanky English voice in my ear telling me it’s brilliant.

    I read this whole post nodding my head because I feel the same way… but I think it’s a logical thing you’ve done, which is:

    1) When you’re young and you don’t have connections, a proper team, or a proper budget, you’re going to get the project done any way possible. And more often than not the only way to do something right is to DIY. So you learn all these different things to have the most quality control… even if it means sleepless nights and carpal tunnel.

    2) Then you start getting recognized for your work, you start building a team, and you find the right people that are specialized. You start handing off the tasks you don’t like (the thing I hate the most: the audio mix). Then you become what you always wanted to be (a director).

    Was it circuitous route to get there? Maybe, but more often than not, a necessary one. And I believe that folks like you should be able to better direct BECAUSE you’ve done most of the individual tasks involved in making a movie. You know how to talk to the different departments because you’ve been in their shoes.

    Looking forward to your short, Skid.

  • Anonymous

    Great post. I was laughing to myself reading it because I’ve taken a similar road. I think it’s actually a good thing to have worn many hats, because it gives me the knowledge of the responsibilities inherent in that role and that knowledge is key in effectively directing a small crew, and bringing a project from inception to completion.

    For the bread and butter work I do (corporate video work) I still find myself wearing largely every hat (minus the producer, production assistant and script supervisor roles–if I can fill them). 

    I write, storyboard, plan the shoot, light it, shoot it, direct it and edit it. Is it important to have specialists in some of these positions? Yes! The final product looks good but having a professional lighting and audio person would make the end result even better and moreover, my life so much easier. 

    I cannot wait for the day when the budget is bigger and I have found a few trusted and talented people to fill some specialized roles. In a perfect world I would have on set with me a dedicated sound person, lighting person and someone waiting in the wings to do some fantastic titling and colour correction. I’m not fantastic at everything, but moreover I just don’t want to wear all the hats, it makes the process too stressful. What I am most interested in is telling a story, the gear knowledge I need to know and roles I must play in order to do that, is totally sidebar.

    Thanks for the post.

  • http://twitter.com/pricejaccobi Price Jaccobi

    I think the dangerous part of being perceived as a multi-hyphenate is

    1. they doubt one person can be multi-skilled since most struggle with even one
    2. they doubt your ability to get a long with others, assume it’s the reason you wear so many hats

    This is where pseudonyms come in I guess.

  • http://twitter.com/NeilSmythe Neil Smythe

    Really interesting as I’m yet another who stresses about the number of hats I’m trying to wear.  10 years ago I thought I’d be a tv producer forever, but over the last 3 years or so I’ve come round to the notion that I need to be all things to all people to survive.  It may indeed be that I’m not doing as much producing as I should be because I’m busy sticking fingers in other pies, but like it or not I only see the industry (I’m talking UK TV in particular) relying more and more on all-rounders rather than specialists.  Unless you’re working at the very top, you’re always going to be faced with dwindling budgets and the easiest way to cope with them is to get less people to do more.
    As much as it does worry me that I’m not able to concentrate on one discipline I do find that having a variety of skills helps me when I revert to producing.  Knowing how I’d shoot, direct or edit a particular piece makes working with crew and editors much smoother.

  • pt

    i’m no web designer, but the light text on the dark background never easy on a dp’s eyes. been meaning to teach myself AEffects and put a stop to the witchcraft antics.

  • http://bradbell.tv/blog/ BradBell

    It’s like film, isn’t it? Get hit with black text on white in a film and you go blind. User studies confirm it. White text on black is easier on the eyes (factoring in contrast in both cases). But browsers used to be stupid and couldn’t print properly, and the the print metaphor never went away and everyone insists that black text on white is correct for no apparent reason. 

    I used to be a web designer. It was a personal issue of note. Now I don’t care anymore 😉

  • Pingback: The Editblog » It’s a Boy again Linkage: December 2011