<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZOOMS VS PRIMES: DAMMIT.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/mns-1974/zooms-vs-primes-dammit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/cameras/zooms-vs-primes-dammit/</link>
	<description>Motion &#38; Stills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 02:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Parkorr</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/cameras/zooms-vs-primes-dammit/comment-page-1/#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Parkorr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopencamera.com/?p=1491#comment-1992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, the infamous Tokina 11-16mm calls again...  soon, soon... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the infamous Tokina 11-16mm calls again&#8230;  soon, soon&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gdmig-wideopencamera.com/cameras/zooms-vs-primes-dammit/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wideopencamera.com/?p=1491#comment-278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well ...the old struggle... in the my fist days of DSLR i was 90-100% primes only .... but after &quot;testing&quot; some nice usable zooms &quot;in the field&quot; i&#039;m now more like 50:50 ;) ... if i have no time on location (esp. so with corporate film shootings) i more likely use almost every time a zoom lens only ( i&#039;m suprisingly happy with my Sigma 17-70mm even it is f2.8-4.5) ... prime-lenses are on my 60D if it comes to &quot;beauty-shots&quot; &amp; low light (like my vintage 50mm f1.4) ... just saying 

thx for that write up Robin!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well &#8230;the old struggle&#8230; in the my fist days of DSLR i was 90-100% primes only &#8230;. but after &#8220;testing&#8221; some nice usable zooms &#8220;in the field&#8221; i&#8217;m now more like 50:50 😉 &#8230; if i have no time on location (esp. so with corporate film shootings) i more likely use almost every time a zoom lens only ( i&#8217;m suprisingly happy with my Sigma 17-70mm even it is f2.8-4.5) &#8230; prime-lenses are on my 60D if it comes to &#8220;beauty-shots&#8221; &amp; low light (like my vintage 50mm f1.4) &#8230; just saying </p>
<p>thx for that write up Robin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
